Preaching has been taken quite lightly by some, especially those in for “filthy lucre.” To find out if preaching is for real, it may be examined using instructional principles. It is basically teaching and so should fulfill the requirements for teaching if ever ...
Members of the Church of God International
Home Publications TOP Magazine Who holds the Key
Leaving Behind the Fundamental Doctrines of Christ
TOP Magazine
Believer Magazine
Super-Preacher In our Times
The Old Path Magazine | Vol. 1 No. 3 | 2005
continuation...

Sending a Clear Message

For a clear message, Bro. Eli would look at his hearers in the eye as he talked. He pronounces words clearly and with sufficient volume. Speaking at an unrushed pace, he would pause now and then, dividing his material into logical chunks. Now and then, he would speak in English, in the Pampanga dialect, in other languages of the country and in Spanish.

The teacher in Bro. Eli is clear and direct, but not simplistic. He doesn’t "talk down" to his listeners especially when he is doing Bible expositions. There are people yet babes in Christ, but he would not "water down” the Bible. He supports what he is saying with proofs, with the screen in full color, or with demonstrations by himself. In between preaching, Bro. Eli takes a breather – like give out news on current world and national events, or talk about medicinal food. Then he would go back to his topic. He doesn’t present material too rapidly or too slowly as to drone people to sleep. He uses repetition, paraphrases the verses, explains in more detail, and provides a written reference (the book, chapter, and verse) for what he says. Other preachers would say, don’t ask for verses or you are of the devil. Also, Bro. Eli would take time to summarize. He keeps looking for other avenues of stating information, and that’s why he sings. Now and then, he would ask if his listeners understood.

Teaching information in the Bible has genuine importance to Bro. Eli that he makes sure his listeners understand why. So he makes connections between day-to-day experiences and truth, and conveys the importance and usefulness of what he’s teaching. He would help his learners see rules, structure and patterns in the Bible with whatever they are learning. He would emphasize the "whys" and the "hows" to let them see embedded facts and details. In fact, most of the time his topics would begin with “Why” or “How.” He knows well to use the words of God to edification, and exhortation, and comfort. (1Cor 14:3).

There is no secret in the Bro. Eli’s being unique, singular, and distinctive. The Bible gives its’ own explanation in John 3:34 as him being sent, therefore speaks the words of God, who gave him unlimited spirit -

For he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God: for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him.

Teaching Strategies

To clarify and reinforce concepts, he would use analogies and personal experiences to promote understanding. This preacher would capitalize on the church background of those aspiring to be members - most of which are what their false preachers do. For example, the confusing sign of the cross which is explained in the Catholic books as “pag-adya sa kaaway” or “precluding the devil,” but then used over the whole congregation by the priest to mean “blessing.” Making the sign of the cross is not taught in the Bible but pointed out in Revelations 13:16 as mark of the anti-Christ - in the right hand and in the forehead. He could be very funny in exemplifying, and his listeners would have their day.

He would sing hymns that he himself or Bro. Nicolas Perez, his predecessor, composed. These are songs of praise to God that he uses to magnify what he is trying to say at the moment. Such songs are expressive and instructive in nature, they do not bank so much on rhymes and rhythm. Without a chalkboard, these would be his educational technology. He would start the song and the congregation would join in – a wave of voices warmly responding in a concentrated pose to blend with his - surprising every guest that comes to observe. The reaction is spontaneous, and even this early, the aspirant to membership would feel esprit de corps, or the common spirit of the group.

The songs are not only the positives, however. He sings the “pasyon” and some love songs too. He sings out in the way that false ministers do, to show their impertinence. He wants to show what is true and what is false. With those who seem to have difficulty learning what he is teaching, he would intervene early and effectively to check if they are listening. With those walking and walking around (the Martha syndrome) while he preaches, and those tending to sleep, he would be very concerned if they cared at all about their salvation.

Arguing

In and out of debates, Bro. Eli does a lot of arguments like a critical thinker should. With an engineer’s mind, he tries to determine his parameters first - by the Book - then pegs them down. From there, he makes his arguments, respecting the boundaries. His enemies on the other hand do not bother to tie their edges down, they just roam sans parameters. And so, when Bro. Eli comes to the fore to examine their stand, they simply flail by the winds of their own ignorance. First, they don’t respect boundaries that they make assumptions. Second, as a consequence of the first, they cannot pin down their definitions, flitting from literal to figurative to literal meanings. Third and most important, and the cause of their first mistake, their source of knowledge is from man.

The preacher in Bro. Eli has chosen not to dazzle viewers with far-out stories in terms of style and technique. Instructively, he wins plaudits without losing his strong connection with his audience. With him teaching and preaching, you could witness the audience clapping now and then. These would be at the points of revelation, at the points where embedded information in the bible verses are clarified. And then you could hear his audience chanting his name, “Bro. Eli…, Bro. Eli…, Bro. Eli….” You would wonder too why clapping is done in cognitive work where analysis would love silence more as most natural. From there, you can only guess that the brilliance he sports - brilliant as brilliance can be - is not natural but revealed or supernatural, founded on the strong foundation of faith.

But he doesn’t bask in those clapping, unassuming as he is. He returns to his topic with a sober mind bent on hammering truth until he is through with it. Should it not sound right (He gets vibes warning him, being a fearful, careful preacher), he would evaluate those clapping even days after that. A godly man that he is, he would say, “Kinabahan ako….pumapalakpak kayo.” (I had bad vibes…. You were clapping.), and then he would lay back the matter point after point perchance the brethren might not have understood deeply what he wanted emphasized. Sensitive to sin, he would not allow even a clap to pass if the audience only appreciated but did not understand the depth and breadth of the issue.

An "alternative" teacher, Bro. Eli’s clear style keeps his listeners grounded and connected, that they can better focus on issues and themes which he is seeking to dramatize and vivify. He can go beyond comedy, onward to the level of satire. He is so bent on pursuing his commission of saving souls that he is willing to do anything to achieve it – like hounding deceivers.